Is modern slavery in your supply chain? Business is failing to act

Australia's Modern Slavery Act requires businesses to report on the risks of modern slavery in their supply chains, but a new report has found these measures are failing

A coalition of human rights organisations and academics are calling on the federal government to overhaul Australia’s modern slavery laws. A major investigation has found, three years into the Modern Slavery Act’s operation, that companies still fail to identify obvious modern slavery risks in their supply chains or take action to address them.

The report, Broken Promises: Two years of corporate reporting under Australia’s Modern Slavery Act, examines the second year of corporate statements submitted to the government’s Modern Slavery Register. The statements are from 92 companies sourced from four sectors with known risks of modern slavery: garments from China, rubber gloves from Malaysia, seafood from Thailand and fresh produce from Australia.

“It’s time for Australian companies to move from ‘paper-driven’ responses to effective action on modern slavery,” said Professor Justine Nolan, Director of the Australian Human Rights Institute at UNSW Sydney. “Too many companies are still failing to identify obvious risks or are simply making vague promises that aren’t being fulfilled.

“While the Modern Slavery Act has generated increased business awareness of the risks of modern slavery, this hasn’t yet translated into effective practices to remediate and eliminate it. This report reveals an urgency to strengthen the law to require action not just reporting, as well as to equip and resource a regulator to provide greater oversight and enforcement of the Act.”

Justine Nolan.jpg
Professor Justine Nolan, Director of the Australian Human Rights Institute at UNSW Sydney, says it's about time Australian businesses take real action to eliminate modern slavery from supply chains. Photo: Supplied

Findings of the Broken Promises report

Freya Dinshaw, a Senior Lawyer at the Human Rights Law Centre, said the research indicates the Modern Slavery Act is currently failing workers.

“While the Act has generated a lot of corporate reporting when you drill down, many of the statements still lack basic required information or make vague commitments which are never fulfilled. There is little evidence the law is driving meaningful action by companies to lift conditions for supply chain workers at high risk of exploitation,” she said.

The report found that:
• 66 per cent of companies reviewed are still failing to comply with the basic reporting requirements mandated by the legislation, with some companies not submitting reports at all
• over half of the commitments made by companies in the first year of reporting to improve their modern slavery response (56 per cent) remain unfulfilled based on their second-year statements
• 43 per cent of companies are still failing to identify obvious modern slavery risks in their supply chains
• there is a mere 6 per cent increase in the number of companies appearing to be taking some form of effective action to address modern slavery risks, with two in three companies still failing to act.

Read more: Subcontracting and sweatshops during coronavirus – the wake-up call businesses need?

Amending the law to achieve results

Broken Promises: Two years of corporate reporting under Australia’s Modern Slavery Act is the follow-up to an earlier report on the first year of corporate reporting, which reached similar conclusions. The Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth) is currently under a three-year statutory review due to report in March 2023.

Amy Sinclair, Regional Representative for Australia, New Zealand & Pacific, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre said the Modern Slavery Act has failed to instigate a ‘race to the top’ by companies wanting to confront modern slavery, more of a slow crawl, with companies averaging a mere 7 per cent rate of improvement in two years.

“These results should be viewed against a backdrop of growing inequality and exploitation of workers as the cost-of-living crisis bites ever harder,” she said.

“Our research has revealed the Act to be an incomplete and inadequate strategy for confronting exploitation and addressing the egregious human rights abuse of modern slavery.

Modern slavery fruit.jpg
The report shows that two-thirds of Australian companies failed to comply with basic reporting requirements mandated by law, with some not submitting reports at all. Image: Shutterstock

“To best do this, Australia requires a more robust law requiring decisive action by companies and penalties for those who fail to take it.”

The coalition of human rights organisations and academics is calling on the government to urgently act to strengthen the legislation by:
• requiring companies to undertake due diligence to prevent and address modern slavery in their operations and supply chains
• introducing penalties for companies that fail to comply with the Act
• ensuring appropriate oversight and enforcement of the Act by appointing an Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner.

Ms Dinshaw says our modern slavery laws need to evolve so that they put people, rather than paper, at their centre.

Subscribe to BusinessThink for the latest research, analysis and insights from UNSW Business School

“In order to be more effective, the Act should be amended to require companies to take action to address modern slavery risks rather than just reporting on their current practices. It should impose penalties on companies that fail to do so and have robust oversight and enforcement by an independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner.

“We urge the government to use the current statutory review to make these key reforms to strengthen the law,” she said.

Justine Nolan is the Director of the Australian Human Rights Institute and a Professor in the Faculty of Law and Justice at UNSW Sydney. 

Republish

You are free to republish this article both online and in print. We ask that you follow some simple guidelines.

Please do not edit the piece, ensure that you attribute the author, their institute, and mention that the article was originally published on Business Think.

By copying the HTML below, you will be adhering to all our guidelines.

Press Ctrl-C to copy